Remembering Paul Laffoley

I do not recall when I first encountered the works of Paul Laffoley (Wikipedia), but his blend of mystical subjects and technical diagrams appealed to me for obvious reasons. I missed an opportunity to meet him at the first Esozone (a.s.a. EsoZone, esoZone) conference in 2007 (August 10–12, Portland, OR), due to other commitments I held. (Fun fact, er, opinion: Following the event, Nicholas Pell commented that Paul gives the best hugs.) Later that year, I loaned my copy of The Phenomenology of Revelation to Michael “Miqel” Coleman so he could scan it for the Laffoley Archive. When the second Esozone came around in 2008, I knew I was going to miss another opportunity to meet Paul, so I asked Miqel if he would have Paul sign my copy of Phenomenology before returning it to me, which he did. Here is Miqel’s photograph of Paul signing the book at the Chaos Café in Portland:

 

Paul Laffoley, The Phenomenology of Revelation

 

A few years later, I gave the book to Dakota as gratitude for his lending his art to some of my projects.

In 2013, I missed my third (and final, it seems) chance to meet Paul, this time during his lecture at the Henry Art Gallery. Fortunately, I was able to see his exhibit (Paul Laffoley: Premonitions of the Bauharoque) there and so visit with some of my favorite of his works in the flesh, so to speak, including “Alchemy: The Telenomic Process of the Universe” and “Thanaton III.” Adjunct to that exhibit was “Mysticism as Information Design” (Wednesday, July 17): “Drawing from sources in alchemy, Theosophy and contemporary art, Joe Milutis, Assistant Professor in the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at UW Bothell will guide visitors through ‘Paul Laffoley: Premonitions of the Bauharoque’. He will situate Laffoley’s work in the context of the long tradition of the mystic diagram, a visual trope that may tell us as much, if not more, about the history of design than the imponderabilia it attempts to grasp” (source). Here is some video from that event:

 

 

Thank you, Paul, for all you have done and all you will inspire others to do.

 

Vita sine Helvetica mors est.
Paul Laffoley
August 14, 1940 – November 16, 2015

Cursing (and Hacking) Up

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
// Ephesians 6:12

Recent news about the Ashley Madison hack reminded me of something I have been wanting to write about on here for a while.

Firstly, I need to introduce the concept of punching up, which “is a term for deploying powerful techniques of criticism and rhetoric to critique and dismantle power structures, rather than to harm people disempowered relative to yourself. It (apparently) comes from comedy, in which the idea is to make fun of powerful people and institutions rather than disempowered people” (Geek Feminism Wiki). If you want to read more about it, here is a good piece from a few years ago.

I have a similar ethic about magical cursing, which I call cursing up. I love baleful and malefic magic; can’t get enough of the stuff, really. But I am not much for cursing my neighbor because he plays his music too loudly or got paint chips in my yard, or cursing a café for serving me poisoned cheesecake (remember Burroughs and the Moka Bar?), or even cursing the Comcast or Dell technical “support” people who really rouse my ire (I am seeing red before I have even finished dialing the numbers to call them). Usually, I have adequate mundane solutions for such things. However, there are many problems in the world today for which I am, frankly, not clever enough to engineer solutions, so I sometimes practice magic either to aid the people who are, or wallop the ones causing the problems (you could say I literally get medieval on them, but my style of magic, while sometimes inspired and informed by my studies of medieval magic, rarely resembles the older craft).

Magic, especially witchcraft, has some history of use by marginalized people. In the introduction to her excellent book, Witches, Erica Jong writes, “The more disempowered people are, the more they long for magic, which explains why magic becomes the province of women in a sexist society. And what are most spells about? Usually procuring love, with the hexing of enemies running a close second.” My idea of cursing up is essentially that adapted to a different theatre and cast of characters.

OK, so, the AM hack. In the past couple of decades there have arisen some hacking and related efforts intended (or seemingly so) to disrupt the activities of, or expose the secrets or lies of, people or institutions abusing their power; e.g. Anonymous and WikiLeaks. Some people call it hacktivism. Others call it crime. What you call it might depend on which side of the power dynamic you side with (which is not necessarily the side you are actually on). It is, to me, similar to cursing up, and although hacking up usually means something different altogether, I shall call it that for the remainder of this brief article.

When you employ satire or maleficium or computer hacking to attack someone (or something, such as a corporation, government, or social or political movement), you should carefully premeditate on whether you are doing it for the right reasons, and what could be the consequences (including the unintended ones) of your action. The hacker or hackers, self-identified as The Impact Team, who perpetrated the AM hack claimed they were doing it because of the unethical practices of the company behind AM, and they acknowledged the pains the hack might cause to “many rich and powerful people.” But did they consider the collateral damage to the spouses and partners of AM users, or how AM has been used by LGBT people who need to hide their sexual identities or preferences for diverse reasons including personal safety? There are now millions of people whose livelihoods or very lives could be at risk because they, or just someone they know, facilitated participation in the ancient (and often sexist, and often complex) institution of adultery, over a medium they had fair reason to believe was private and secure.

And what about The Impact Team’s sexual moralism? Anyone can claim they are punching up. Homophobic Christians satirizing gay people can say they are punching up, but gay bashing is clearly not about overcoming an oppressive or despotic power structure.

The whole point of punching, cursing, or hacking up is to disempower those who are acquiring their power at the pains of others, or using their power to hurt others. When you hurt the people who are already hurting, in the process, you defeat the purpose.

Howard Rheingold’s Magical Objects

I have been a fan of Howard Rheingold for a long time. His ideas about computers as mind amplifiers are as relevant (and revelatory) today as they ever were. He has the consciousness-expanding optimism of Timothy Leary tempered with a good deal more critical thinking. He and I dig many of the same people in computing including Myron Krueger and Brenda Laurel (how many of you knew there were TED Talks in 1998?). Some years ago, I had the good fortune of enrolling in Howard’s Introduction to Mind Amplifiers course, and I still think about and use much of what I learned there, to this day.

Recently, Howard has been making a variety of magical objects brought to life by Arduino microcontrollers—their magic leaning more toward the numinous (and luminous!) than sorcerous. Check these out:

There are more videos of these objects on Howard’s YouTube channel, also some Arduino tutorials and other good stuff.